Work Ahead

Now that summer is officially over, the pace will pick up on Council. We will begin in earnest, having already had our first budget work session, to put together a budget that is devised in a very different way than has been done before. It's a process known as Budgeting for Outcomes, which essentially requires public leaders to set a price for the city government and to figure out what citizen's most value and how to spend taypayer dollars. I'd encourage you to read about it at http://www.psg.us/resources/osborneletterbfoupdate.html.

We will also have to begin to grapple with a Capital Plan in the city that offers little wiggle room in terms of debt capacity and the stability of our bond rating. So it would seem to me that we'll stick again with more infrastructural and existing capital projects in the current five-year plan.

We'll also be dealing with putting together a Master Plan for the former Countryside Golf Club property. Any plan should have significant recreational components that include well-designed green spaces. Other ideas that I heard at the multiple public meetings for neighbors of the property and other stakeholders could include some nice and compatible housing, a village center, a conference center, playing fields and other ideas. All stakeholders will have the opportunity to provide more public input beyond the meetings already held, and I hope folks will take advantage of that opportunity.

We're already working and have just gone through a third draft of the city's annual legislative plan, and members of Council will likely go to Richmond to lobby the General Assembly on certain requested legislative changes. I'm sure there will also be a lot of talk about our need for the Commonwealth to stop the massive funding cuts to public education.

We've got a busy fall ahead and I'm sure more will arise as we head into winter. There's a lot to be done.

City Council: Correcting the media record

Yesterday was the first City Council meeting of the new fiscal year, and one of the main areas of discussion centered on the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which determines what we will build or repair in terms of capital expeditures. Most of the money for any capital improvements would be borrowed and payments, as with any loan, would be due plus interest.

It is important that I correct some errors that a couple of news outlets reported yesterday/last night/this morning. NO project (Market Building, Amphitheater, Washington Park Pool) was approved to move forward yesterday. Yesterday required no votes. It was City Council directing staff to include certain items in the CIP which has to be FINALLY approved in the next month or so.

This said, and knowing these mistakes in reporting by the media were based on a complicated system of legislating, I think it would do the community a service for those outlets to run corrective stories, and hopefully they will.

So, where do I stand on capital projects? I will support moving forward with an extensive renovation of the Market Building. It is sorely needed and badly overdue.

As of now, I will not support construction of an amphitheater ($13 million), municipal operation of a golf course (minimum $2 million known) or a regional waterpark ($3.6 million). I do not believe we can afford these items and that both will require subsidies in perpetuity once they are built. In a city with over $60 million in needed stormwater repairs, more than $7 million in bridge renovation and repair and millions in needed neighborhood improvements, I cannot support building luxury items that will cause increased taxpayer subsidies when we already are forced to subsidize other facilities we own (civic center, market building).

To clarify once again, there was no need for any vote on the CIP yesterday. For instance, I voted yes on putting the Amphitheater on the table for inclusion in the CIP. I could have as easily said 'no,' but again, these were not technical votes. The real debate will begin as the final CIP draft is provided to us.

Just wanted to set the record straight.